|


Samuel
Merrill, 1928, reprint 1983
English
Origins of the Merrill Family - Chapter III,
pp28-31
It
does not appear by Rev. Samuel-H. Merrills papers
that in his researches of fifty years ago he paid much
attention to the question of the English origin of the
family. As to the European origin of the Merrill
family I have no certain information, he wrote,
in a letter to Gyles Merrill of Haverhill, dated 12 April,
1869. To this he added: Your information is correct
that the two brothers, John and Nathaniel, came from Salisbury,
England. That they were of French descent is highly probable.
But the reasons which Rev. Mr. Merrill assigned for belief
in the theory of French descent are very unconvincing.
The family temperament, he argued, is generally mercurial,
and this is a French characteristic. The ending -lle,
furthermore, is very common in French proper names, but
not in English names, he said. Finally, there were
none of the name in England in 1520, but there were Merrills
in France at that date. If these reasons were based
on accurate statements of fact they would be entitled
to considerable weight, but Mr. Merrill (See page 100.)
is not in accord with General Merrill with respect to
family temperament, and in the previous chapter it has
appeared that similar family names were known in England
at a much earlier date than 1520.
Salisbury,
in Wilts
Gyles7
Merrill, like Rev. Samuel-H. Merrill, felt a strong conviction
that the Merrill s of Newbury came from Salisbury, in
Wiltshire, in the South of England.
This
belief was based solely on tradition. Nathaniel1
Merrill was presumably more than 50 years of age at his
death in 1655. His son Daniel2 lived in Salisbury,
Mass., six or eight miles from his fathers homestead,
and died at the age of 74. Daniels son Moses3
spent his life in Salisbury, and died at the age of 72.
Moses4, of the next generation, spent most
of his life in Salisbury, and in Haverhill, less than
fifteen miles away, and died at the age of 87. Rev. Gyles5
Merrill lived in Haverhill, within a quarter of a mile
of the homestead occupied in his later years by his father,
Moses4, and died at 62. Moses6 Merrill
lived in the house which had been the parsonage of his
father, and died when 88 years of age. Here were six generations,
with no long migrations to distant parts, and without
the consequent interruption of frequent communication,
the grandsons in most cases presumably hearing reminiscences
and stories of olden time from the lips of their grandfathers.
Under such circumstances a tradition is entitled to a
maximum of credence. In this line of the family tradition
pointed strongly to Salisbury as the English home of the
Newbury Merrills.
But
traditions at best are uncertain. Other settlers in the
neighborhood had come from Salisbury and Amesbury in Wiltshire,
and had given the names to the towns of Salisbury and
Amesbury in Massachusetts. It is quite possible that,
a generation or two after the death of Nathaniel1
and his brother, the impression may have been created
that Nathaniel too was from the Wiltshire city, and this
impression may easily in later years have crystallized
into an assertion of fact. A chain is no stronger than
its weakest link, however, and a chain of tradition is
no stronger than the memory of that one in the chain of
those who have handed down the tradition whose memory
is least to be depended on. Nevertheless, if no records
or other evidence pointing in some other direction had
been found, the Salisbury tradition might still carry
considerable weight.
A
somewhat superficial search of the church records of Salisbury,
England, yielded negative results. No reference to Nathaniel1
Merrill or his brother was found, but the records of many
churches in that vicinity have not been examined.*
Other
Theories
Among
other places which have been considered the possible English
home of the Newbury Merrills are Cheshire, Grafton Flyford
in Worcestershire, and Somersetshire, but each theory
has lacked the necessary evidence to substantiate it.
A correspondent in New Hampshire wrote me some years ago,
quoting his father as saying that the family name was
originally McMerrill, and that he was a descendant of
Robert McMerrill, a soldier in the army of Robert Bruce.
Inasmuch as my correspondent was not sure of his grandfathers
christian name, I made no effort to trace, with his assistance,
the connection with the Scottish soldier of six hundred
years ago.
The
Merrells of Suffolk
Evidence
stronger than tradition, bearing on the question of the
English origin of the family, is to be found in Hartford,
Conn., and in English records brought to light in following
the clue furnished by the records in Hartford.
John2 Merrill, a son of the
emigrant, left Newbury soon after the death of his father,
and is supposed to have been adopted by Gregory Wolterton
of Hartford. In his will, dated 17 July, 1674, Gregory
Wolterton named John Merrill (See pages 82-3) as residuary
legatee, and also gave unto James wolterton the
son of mathew wolterton that liue in Ipsage in sufolke
in owld Ingland ten pound if he be liuing if not to his
Childeren eaquelly deuided.
In
Gregory Woltertons will few words were wasted. He
did not tell the relationship that may have existed between
James Wolterton and himself; and he did not refer to any
relationship as the reason why he made John2
Merrill the chief beneficiary of his will. But following
the clue furnished by this will the records of Ipswich,
England, and some of the neighboring parishes were searched,
and they seem to have yielded evidence that the English
home of the Merrills was in southern Suffolk, rather than
in Wiltshire.
The
Calendar of Wills at Ipswich between 1444 and 1600 shows
twenty-three entries under the various spellings Merrell,
Morrell, Murrell, Murell, Meryell, Morriell and Moriell.
Whether these individuals were representatives of different
branches of the same family it is not necessary to discuss
at this time: it is sufficient to note that certain of
them may have been in the direct family line of Nathaniel
Merrill of Newbury. In the same Calendar there are also
references, in the fifteenth century, to the wills of
Thomas Woolverston of Freston and John Waterden of Bramford,
and in the early sixteenth century to the wills of John
Watterden of Needham Market and John Waterden of Needham.
Whether these latter names are variants of Wolterton I
am unable to say, but, in view of the wide latitude which
recording officers in those days permitted themselves
in writing family names, it may easily be that some of
these men were lineal forbears of the prosperous tanner
of Hartford.
Before
we make up our minds, however, that the English home of
the family was in southern Suffolk, it will of course
be necessary to find more direct and positive evidence
than is contained in the will of Gregory Wolterton, or
in the Calendar of Wills just quoted.
To
this subject I shall devote the following chapter.
* In
the register of St. Edmund's Church, Salisbury, between
1596 and 1617, twenty-six baptism of children named Myrhell
or Mirhell were recorded. They seem to represent seven
family groups.
Chapter
IV
If
you have further information on the book, "A Merrill
Memorial" and would like to share it with others,
please contact
me.
|